Skip to content

Bisy Services

Actualités

How to choose a responsible health supplement without complicating your life?

Choosing a responsible health supplement means comparing contracts that all meet the same regulatory specifications, but where reimbursement levels, additional services, and prices vary significantly. In 2026, the context makes the exercise more…

Femme de 40 ans comparant des documents de complémentaire santé à sa table de cuisine, expression concentrée et détendue
5 min read

Choosing a responsible health insurance plan means comparing contracts that all adhere to the same regulatory specifications, but whose reimbursement levels, additional services, and prices can vary significantly. In 2026, the context makes this exercise more challenging: freezing of contributions on certain contracts, expansion of the 100% Health basket, and announced transfers of reimbursements from Health Insurance to mutual insurance companies.

Measuring the concrete differences between guarantees allows for a quick choice, without getting lost in reading dozens of tables.

Transfers of reimbursement to mutuals: what changes in 2026

The government announced in July 2026 new transfers of reimbursements from Health Insurance to complementary insurance, particularly concerning certain dental care, medical transport, certain medications, and medical devices. This shift means that a responsible contract now covers a broader share of health expenses, without the increased burden automatically resulting in an immediate increase in contributions.

For the insured, the direct consequence is simple: a contract with guarantees deemed sufficient last year may prove inadequate this year if the transferred items pertain to their usual care. Checking coverage for dental care and medical transport has become a useful reflex before any subscription.

Those who wish to delve deeper into this simplification logic can discover the Pharma Planet website, which details the procedures related to responsible contracts in the current regulatory context.

Minimum guarantees of a responsible contract: comparative table of obligations

Couple in their thirties comparing responsible health insurance offers on a laptop in their modern living room

All responsible contracts share a common foundation imposed by regulation. Therefore, price differences between mutuals play out above this foundation. The table below summarizes the minimum and maximum limits that any responsible contract must adhere to.

Care Item Minimum Coverage Ceiling or Restriction
Co-payment (consultations, procedures) Full co-payment coverage No regulatory ceiling
Daily hospital fee Unlimited duration coverage None
Optics (100% Health basket) Zero out-of-pocket for basket equipment Renewal every two years (unless vision changes)
Dental (100% Health basket) Zero out-of-pocket for basket prosthetics Limited to procedures listed in the nomenclature
Audiology (100% Health basket) Zero out-of-pocket for basket hearing aids Renewal every four years
Excess fees (non-OPTAM doctor) Not mandatory Reimbursement capped by regulation

This foundation guarantees that every responsible contract covers the co-payment and daily hospital fee without a time limit. However, excess fees outside of coordinated care pathways remain poorly or not covered, which constitutes the main blind spot for insured individuals consulting specialists in sector 2.

Expanded 100% Health basket: hair prosthetics and wheelchairs

The 100% Health basket is no longer limited to optics, dental, and audiology. Wheelchairs have been covered since December 1, 2025, and hair prosthetics since January 1, 2026. These additions change the concrete interest of a responsible contract for specific profiles: patients undergoing oncological treatment, individuals with motor disabilities.

Most mutual insurance selection guides do not yet incorporate these expansions. An insured person concerned with one of these items should check that their contract explicitly mentions coverage under the 100% Health basket, and not just an annual capped allowance for these devices.

Difference between the 100% Health basket and offers outside the basket

For optical or dental equipment, the zero out-of-pocket basket offers standardized ranges. Insured individuals who want high-end progressive lenses or ceramic-metal crowns outside the nomenclature must compare the reimbursement ceilings beyond the basket. This is where the differences in contributions between mutuals are most justified.

60-year-old man consulting an advisor in an agency to choose a responsible and suitable health insurance plan

Concrete criteria for quickly comparing responsible contracts

Since the regulatory foundation is identical everywhere, the comparison focuses on a few discriminating variables:

  • The level of reimbursement for excess fees, expressed as a percentage of the conventional rate. A contract that reimburses excess fees for OPTAM doctors at a high rate is better suited for insured individuals followed by specialists in sector 2.
  • Hospital coverage beyond the daily fee: private room, accompanying person, comfort package. These guarantees impact the contribution but become crucial in the case of prolonged hospitalization.
  • The waiting period applied to certain items (orthodontics, dental implants). Some contracts impose several months of waiting before any coverage for these costly procedures.
  • Additional services: generalized third-party payment, partner care network (which reduces actual out-of-pocket expenses), included teleconsultation.

Comparing on these four axes is sufficient to differentiate the majority of offers. Multiplying criteria beyond five or six parameters complicates the decision without improving the choice.

Freezing contributions and the risk of delayed increases

The legal freeze on contributions applied in 2026 to individual and collective contracts temporarily skews the reading of prices. A contract advertised at an attractive price this year may face a price adjustment the following year, once the freeze is lifted.

This risk increases if the transfers of reimbursement from Social Security burden the mutuals. Checking the history of annual increases of the organization over the last three years provides a more reliable indicator than the price displayed at the moment. A contract stable over several years offers better protection than a one-time low price.

The expansion of the 100% Health basket, the transfers of reimbursement, and the temporary freeze on contributions reshape the criteria for choosing a responsible complementary insurance. The regulatory foundation covers the essentials, and the real arbitration occurs on excess fees, ceilings outside the basket, and the price stability of the chosen organization.

How to choose a responsible health supplement without complicating your life?